Comparison of batch and continuous control
in chemical manufacturing
While often discussed as if they are
without overlap, batch and continuous operations share
many functions. Understanding these similarities as well as the
distinctions, can help you better understand your own operations
and new developments in controls.
First, while there are plants that run purely batch or
continuous processes, many have both. A batch plant might have continuous operations. A continuous plant is likely to employ
batch controls for some processes.
Logically, batch control code is continuous
logic plus the capability to routinely stop and start. From this
perspective, one could argue that batch controls are more complex than
those required for a continuous operations.
This perspective is unlikely to impress managers of
continuous operations who know an an hour of unplanned downtime
can cost tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. For this
reason, controls for continuous operations almost always include
more safeguards to keep processes online. Traditionally,
continuous plant manufacturing managers have favored distributed control systems.
Still, as the table below demonstrates, the common ground is
considerable.
Another traditional distinction fades as well
If the distinctions between process operations categories are
blurring, it should be little surprise another is also fading away: The difference in capabilities
between DCS and programmable logic controller-based controls
systems.
Today's
DCS systems now offer many PLC-like functions, if not integrated
PLCs themselves. PLC providers have developed control platforms
or systems around their logic units. Whatever the vendors might
call them, these are now hybrid systems.
For the most part, this capabilities and features race is good
for those upgrading or installing controls. While some differences remain, some
now argue that nearly all
operations can be successfully managed with either type of
system. The choice can come down to familiarity and prefer as
much as capabilities.
Comparison of batch and continuous operations
|
Process
|
Batch
|
Continuous
|
|
Automated raw material charging
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Benchmarking
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Mixing
|
Yes
|
Some
|
|
Reactor inerting
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Heating and cooling
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Data historians
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Agitator and motor control
|
Yes
|
Infrequent
|
|
Reactor discharge
|
Yes
|
Some
|
|
Filter press automation
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Spray drying
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Surge tank
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Scrubbers
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Ingredient metering
|
Yes |
Yes
|
|
Reflux return/recycle stream
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Gas separation
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Columns/Strippers/Overheads
|
Infrequent
|
Yes
|
|
Batch blending
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
In-line blending
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Filtration
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Tank farm systems
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Filling
|
Yes
|
Some
|
|
Skid and subsystem control integration
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Process waste water treatment
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Incineration control and heat recovery
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Clean/wash
|
Yes
|
Infrequent
|
|
Real time monitoring
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Sampling integration
|
Infrequent
|
Yes
|
|
Solvent recovery
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Pilot plants
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Compression and condensing
|
Infrequent
|
Yes
|
|
Weighing systems
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Centrifuge
|
Yes
|
No
|