Comparison of batch and continuous control in chemical manufacturing
| While often discussed as if they are
without overlap, batch and continuous operations share
many functions. Understanding these similarities as well as the
distinctions, can help you better understand your own operations
and new developments in controls. First, while there are plants that run purely batch or continuous processes, many have both. A batch plant might have continuous operations. A continuous plant is likely to employ batch controls for some processes. Logically, batch control code is continuous logic plus the capability to routinely stop and start. From this perspective, one could argue that batch controls are more complex than those required for a continuous operations. This perspective is unlikely to impress managers of continuous operations who know an an hour of unplanned downtime can cost tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. For this reason, controls for continuous operations almost always include more safeguards to keep processes online. Traditionally, continuous plant manufacturing managers have favored distributed control systems. Still, as the table below demonstrates, the common ground is considerable. Another traditional distinction fades as wellIf the distinctions between process operations categories are blurring, it should be little surprise another is also fading away: The difference in capabilities between DCS and programmable logic controller-based controls systems. Today's DCS systems now offer many PLC-like functions, if not integrated PLCs themselves. PLC providers have developed control platforms or systems around their logic units. Whatever the vendors might call them, these are now hybrid systems. For the most part, this capabilities and features race is good for those upgrading or installing controls. While some differences remain, some now argue that nearly all operations can be successfully managed with either type of system. The choice can come down to familiarity and prefer as much as capabilities. Comparison of batch and continuous operations |
|
Process |
Batch |
Continuous |
|
Automated raw material charging |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Benchmarking |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Mixing |
Yes |
Some |
|
Reactor inerting |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Heating and cooling |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Data historians |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Agitator and motor control |
Yes |
Infrequent |
|
Reactor discharge |
Yes |
|
|
Filter press automation |
Yes |
|
|
Spray drying |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Surge tank |
Y |
Y |
|
Scrubbers |
Y |
Y |
|
Ingredient metering |
Yes |
|
|
Reflux return/recycle stream |
Y |
Y |
|
Gas separation |
Y |
Y |
|
Columns/Strippers/Overheads |
|
Y |
|
Batch blending |
Y |
|
|
In-line blending |
|
Yes |
|
Filtration |
Y |
Y |
|
Tank farm systems |
Y |
Y |
|
Filling |
Y |
Some |
|
Skid and subsystem control integration |
Y |
Y |
|
Process waste water treatment |
Y |
Y |
|
Incineration control and heat recovery |
Y |
Y |
|
Clean/wash |
Y |
Infrequent |
|
Real time monitoring |
Y |
Y |
|
Sampling integration |
Infrequent |
Y |
|
Solvent recovery |
Y |
Y |
|
Pilot plants |
Y |
Y |
|
Compression and condensing |
Infrequent |
Y |
|
Weighing systems |
Y |
Y |
|
Centrifuge |
Y |
|
